Showing posts with label plans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label plans. Show all posts

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Foundation Information Overload!!!

I wish....

Went down to the building dept yesterday to try to find any documentation on the foundation redo here at Chez Neumansky 3.0.
Last time I went down, about six months ago, they didn't have anything for it! It was apparently lost in a nether world or something?

This time they had it scanned into the computer and the very, very nice people at the dept printed out what they had for me to look at.......

Behold the super detailed, high-tech document that got you a foundation permit in '01....

Yep, that's it....well, maybe not, but this was the only bit from the finaled foundation permit that was scanned in....so maybe there was more documentation originally and it got misplaced??? I doubt it....

No footing sections, no rebar schedule, no slab section...no nothing...
How, is this enough to get a permit for a foundation redo? Blows me away...

The city has minimum standards for foundations on their website.
http://www.cityofalamedaca.gov/getdoc.cfm?id=168

Lets just hope that with it being inspected and approved by a city inspector that we got at least the 2 story foundation..though I am hoping that its the 3-story version.

Crazy right? The most important thing holding this house up and this is all the docs the city has kept on it....

Saturday, May 1, 2010

What Lies Ahead Part 2

When last we left off we were talking about the permits that we have that are due to expire this October. For fun here is a clip of the section of the plans that go along with the permit.

Here was the existing bottom floor as we found it. Love how the garage enters into the unit via the bathroom? and how the middle bedroom can only be entered through the bathroom also! Talk about a multi-use space.

Below we have the after that we're supposed to have finished by Oct! Sorry about the small size if you click on the picture its readable-ish. Wow, look at all that stuff!! What was I thinking! Basically the only parts of the above that are done are the slab-foundation, the radiant heating, the tankless water heater and some of the earthquake retro-fitting! That means we've got to do all the plumbing still, the wiring, I've got to actually install a kitchen! the bathroom(which is on a seperate permit), frame out the garage and utility closets, insulate and sheet rock everything! Just basically finish everything!

Ya, it'll just take a couple of weekends right!?!?!

Sheesh, what'd I get myself into!

Saturday, February 13, 2010

We Finally Heard Back from Winans Construction!

Well, sorta....

Its been a week since I sent my last letter, where I tell them that I had better hear from them or else the next thing they are going to be hearing from me is my lawyer...as in the deadline is officially past and here's what I get in my email from them...

Winans Construction wins 2010 Regional Contractor of the Year (CotY) AwardThe National Association of the Remodeling Industry (NARI) named Winans Construction, Inc., in Oakland, CA, 2010 Regional CotY (Contractor of the Year) winner in the Residential Interior $100,000 and Over category of its annual awards competition. The award-winning entry was the remodel of the circa-1908 Alameda home of Celeste and Sam Tamura. Their small upstairs kitchen had been in need of an update for years, while other areas of the house were less than optimal. "The awkwardness of our kitchen kept us from entertaining as much as we would have liked," says Celeste, "We had to cook upstairs and bring the food downstairs to our guests." Read More.....
Winans Construction, Inc.3947 Opal StreetOakland, CA 94609(510) 653-7288info@WinConInc.comwww.WinConInc.com
Winans Construction is a 32-year old design-build firm specializing in major residential remodeling projects in the East Bay, San Francisco and surrounding areas. The company has received numerous local and national awards including the highest recognition for quality achievement in the remodeling industry-the coveted National Remodeling Quality Gold Award.KITCHENS · MASTER SUITES · ADDITIONSBASEMENT CONVERSIONS · BATHROOMSFor more information, visit our website, or

The project this letter is talking about is the one in Alameda who's references we checked and also the project where I said if Winans could show me the stamped set of plans from that were as bad as the set they are trying to pawn off on me that I'd drop most of my issues.

This email looks like it came from the top guy there too.....

Does this seem like a big F-U to you? It kinda seems that way to me.

They are ignoring all my requests to fix our dispute and instead they send me an email about how this project won awards?

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Yet More Troubles in Design-Build Land

Got a letter in the mail today from Winans Construction from the big boss.

Why they felt the need to send it snail mail is beyond me. I'm not going to transcribe the entire thing but the gist of it is......

We're the pros you're not and we think the plans are fine as is pay us the money now!!!

That kinda chapped my hide a bit as I believe that I have several legit concerns that they are just glossing over....

I sent them the following email just now, we'll see how they respond.

Having received Garys letter today I thought it prudent to clarify a few things from my earlier emails. The following is the complete list of issues I have with the plan set and the design contract in general.

Plan Set Issues: I am willing to entertain the idea that the 4 independent GC’s who looked over your plans and who all basically had the same issues are somehow wrong. You have recently done a house remodel in Alameda correct? If you can show me the set of plans for that job stamped and approved by the city and the cities engineer and those plans are not significantly different in detail-style, i.e. the engineers’ plans are hand drawn with no dimensions and missing sections I will concede most of the points below.

Plan Set Issues:

Engineers Plans: I understand that there can be back and forth with the cities engineer regarding the engineering portion of the plans but I believe my issues are separate from that.


E1) The final engineering plan shown in these documents is not the plan the engineer and I settled on and is not what I believed I was paying for.
E2) The engineers’ plans do not appear complete. The call-outs reference parts of the plan that are not shown. Call outs A, B, C, D are not shown in the engineers framing plans. It really appears that the engineer simply forgot to include the roof framing plan in this set as these call outs would seem to reference this. Do you realize that he doesn’t even call out the size of the parrallam ridge beams anywhere?
E3) My concern that the plans being hand written and hard to read several of the post call-outs are incomplete.
E4) Why are there no dimensions on the engineers plan?
E5) How is the engineers wet stamp not included in the price of these plans?
E6) Where are the engineers calcs that have to be included for permit submittal?

General Concerns:

G1) It looks to me like all the plans need to be ‘cleaned up’ there are spurious dimension lines, and dimensions, on the 2nd floor demo plan, the 1st floor construction plan, 2nd floor construction plan (G), and (H) is misnamed 2nd floor construction plan when it should be 2nd floor electrical plan. I mention this as I believe that these are the kinds of things that will get it kicked out of plan check in a hurry.
G2) The lack of a real zoning/planning set of plans. The zoning set is significantly different than the permit set I do not understand how you can consider them to be the same.
G3) Where are the details for flashing the doors and windows and roof?
G4) Where are the details for flashing the doors and windows and roof?
G5) Is there going to be an insulation plan?
G6) The electrical plans were much too cluttered-trying to show too much on the same diagram.

General Design Agreement Issues:
D1) From your letter I do not seem to have in my files your section E-1. If this was done it should be a simple matter of printing it out and sending it on or emailing it to me.
D2) Where is the finish schedule. I believe that part of this process was to spec out all the finishes with costs, I do not have this in my files.

I can not consider our design agreement fulfilled until all the above items are corrected to my satisfaction.

For future correspondence please reference my concerns by item number, i.e. ‘We are discussing issue E1 with the engineer and will get back to you asap’ While I understand that several of the above items can be considered a matter of opinion E1 and E2 certainly are not.

Respectfully,
Daniel Neumansky


If Winans Construction will not make good on the above issues we are kinda screwed. I've already got a rough estimate from another engineer and its going to cost at least $3000 to have him redo-check-complete the existing engineering plans....this is more than I owe Winans Construction to complete this agreement.

I'll have to create the zoning plan set myself, I'll have to clean up the permit set myself. I don't really want to do this as one, my time is precious and two, I think I've already paid them to do this for me.

Arrrrrrgh!!!!!

Irene and I sat down today discussed what we thought we were getting from Winans Construction with this agreement.

  1. A complete permit ready set of plans. This to us means a really complete set of plans that have a reasonably good chance of being accepted as is.
  2. A complete scope of work broken out with costs for each section
  3. As part of the scope of work a finish schedule showing the costs of all the lights, tin ceiling, etc.

I'm willing to concede that what I thought I was getting is a bid-set of plans which is really what we need, but the wording of the agreement is for a permit-ready set of plans which has less detail.

We'll see how it goes. I'll keep y'all up to date.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Troubles in Design-Build Land...

So, the week after new years a box showed up on my doorstep with several copies of our house plans and a cd-rom of digital versions of such. I'd like to note that we were promised this box-o-goodies the week after Thanksgiving!! and had not heard so much as a peep from Winans Construction in the intervening several weeks....

I realize that none of this is going to make any sense unless you look at the drawings. If you right click HERE and select save target as you should be able to save the pdf versions of the plans to your local drive.

After finding time to look at the plans we had several concerns that we voiced to our project manager that weekend. The email is cut&pasted below.


Hello Amy,
We’ve had time to look thru the plan set in detail and have some issues with what we are seeing and a couple of things that we don’t understand.

Plan Set Issues we have noticed so far.

Engineers plan is not what we decided on still shows new footing in radiant heated areas.


Concerned that showing the proposed deck at the back of the house will be an issue-confuse the planning and building dept people.


The plan shows the proposed rear deck starting 2’ in from the side of the house; we need it to start at the edge of the house and use the 2 existing columns.


Concerned Engineers drawings will be too light for city to accept. I have been chastised in the past for drawings where they thought the lines were too thin-too hard to read.


The engineer’s wet stamp is not included in price? How can his stamp not be included in the price? We do not understand this.


Your note says that we have 2 copies of the planning plan set and 3 copies of the building permit plan set. What I see is 5 copies of the building permit plan set. It is our understanding that the planning set should be different from the building permit plan set. I believe that the planning set needs to show such things as all exterior views before and after, and not show interior detail, the planning set might also require photographs of the exterior views of the house and the neighboring properties?


It looks to me like all the plans need to be ‘cleaned up’ there are spurious dimension lines, and dimensions, on the 2nd floor demo plan, the 1st floor construction plan, 2nd floor construction plan (G), and (H) is misnamed 2nd floor construction plan when it should be 2nd floor electrical plan. I mention this as I believe that these are the kinds of things that will get it kicked out of plan check in a hurry.

I’m sure that you are eager to bring this matter to a close, as are we, but these issues will need to be addressed to our satisfaction before we sign off on the project and send you the final check.

Respectfully,
Daniel Neumansky

After a week had gone by and I had not heard anything I resent the message and bcc'd the project managers boss. Here's the message;


It’s been a week since I sent this email and since I have not heard from you I’m resending it.

I’ve been looking thru my documents and I have a few more questions.


I don’t see where I have a broken-out quote for all the work shown in this plan? That would be the entire upstairs plus the entire kitchen area plus the new deck wouldn’t it?


Where are the finish selections defined?

I’m sure that you are eager to bring this matter to a close, as are we, but these issues will need to be addressed to our satisfaction before we sign off on the project and send you the final check.

Respectfully,

Daniel Neumansky

I pretty immediately got a reply from the big boss which was simply, that he would look into it and get back to me that week.....

Well a week went by and in that time I had other general contractors look at the plans and I sent Winans Construction this email.


I’ve had several local contractors look over the plan set you have provided me and there was a consensus of opinion on several issues.

The consensus opinion on the engineers plans were: Why are they not computer drawn like the rest of the plans? They are hard to read. The writing is not legible enough. Why are there no dimensions on the plans and the plans do not appear complete. They are all wondering about a roof framing plan and feel that the call-outs do not explain enough. In fact the ridge beams are not even shown in the engineers’ sketches? They are also wondering about the framing for the dormers with the swoop roofs. None of them can understand the need for the C 10 to be bolted to both sides of the 6by10 beam in the basement? They all felt that the city would not accept the engineers’ portion as is.


Where are the details for flashing the doors and windows and roof?


Where is the finish schedule?


They felt the electrical plans were much too cluttered-trying to show too much on the same diagram.


When asked if they felt this was a complete enough plan set to build the remodel they all said no. One said after looking at the plans for over an hour he’d probably have 40 questions for the engineer and designer of the plans.

Respectfully,

Daniel Neumansky

We have not heard back as of yet from the folks at Winans Construction....this is kinda bumming us out as they appeared to be stand up guys but there is sooo much wrong with the plan set that they sent us that I don't know what to do about it. The engineers plans are just plain wrong, not the plan we had decided on at all and the floor plans look more like a 2nd rough draft as opposed to a final copy.

When I hear back from Winans Construction I'll let y'all know what they say...

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

What Should Our Remodel Cost?

Remodeling magazine has a very famous report they do every year called 'Remodeling Magazines Cost vs. Value report' I am going to use the values from the report to get a ball park figure for our house remodel.


The report is pretty neat. They poll a ton of contractors, estimators, appraisers across the U.S. to get numbers for the costs of the 'standard' projects they track. To get the payback numbers they then poll a bunch of Realtors to arrive at a consensus view. To me it seems like the cost numbers are much more closely tied to reality vs the value numbers which seem more like a consensus of opinion.


Here's the main page of the interactive online report. You can click on your region and then if you're lucky you can click on a more specific region where you live to get numbers tied to your reality as closely as possible.


The San Francisco Bay area numbers can be found here. Its no surprise that the costs for our area are higher than the national average by a good amount.


The left most column is what the job costs and next is how much that job added to the resale value of the house. The third column is the most interesting in that its the % of cost recouped.


The SF Bay area info is most interesting and different from the national in that several jobs return more than they cost! The national average only shows that adding a steel front door returns more than it costs! San Francisco truly is a world onto its own.


The jobs that had a positive net return were (these are for the mid-range projects);




  • Attic Bedroom at 102.6%


  • Deck Addition at 104.2%


  • Window replacement (vinyl) 104.3%


  • Window replacement (wood) 104.5%


  • Minor Kitchen Remodel 112.2%


  • Entry door replacement 119.2%


  • Major Kitchen Remodel 100%

Hey that's looking really good for us as several of the above are projects that we plan on doing!


The only project that apparently will lose us money is the master suite addition which only returns 86.2%.


According to the descriptions the jobs that sync up most closely with our remodel plan are, Major kitchen remodel, attic bedroom, deck addition, master suite addition.


Attic bedroom: Cost = $65,829 Value= $67,531 Description: Convert unfinished attic space to a 15-by-15-foot bedroom and a 5-by-7-foot bathroom with shower. Include a 15-foot shed dormer, four new windows, and closet space under the eaves. Insulate and finish ceiling and walls. Carpet floor. Extend existing HVAC to new space; provide electrical wiring and lighting to code. Retain existing stairs, but add rail and baluster around stairwell.


Major Kitchen Remodel: Cost = $67,789 Value= $67,815 Description:Update an outmoded 200-square-foot kitchen with a functional layout of 30 linear feet of semi-custom wood cabinets, including a 3-by-5-foot island; laminate countertops; and standard double-tub stainless-steel sink with standard single-lever faucet. Include energy-efficient wall oven, cooktop, ventilation system, built-in microwave, dishwasher, garbage disposal, and custom lighting. Add new resilient flooring. Finish with painted walls, trim, and ceiling.


Deck Addition(wood): Cost= $13,642 Value=$14,196 Description: Add a 16-by-20-foot deck using pressure-treated joists supported by 4x4 posts anchored to concrete piers. Install pressure-treated deck boards in a simple linear pattern. Include a built-in bench and planter of the same decking material. Include stairs, assuming three steps to grade. Provide a complete railing system using pressure-treated wood posts, railings, and balusters.


Master Suite Addition: Cost= $132,443 Value= $114,104 Description: Add a 24-by-16-foot master bedroom suite over a crawlspace. Include walk-in closet/dressing area, whirlpool tub in ceramic tile platform, separate 3-by-4-foot ceramic tile shower, and double-bowl vanity with solid-surface countertop. Bedroom floor is carpet; bathroom floor is ceramic tile. Painted walls, ceiling, and trim. General and spot lighting, exhaust fan; electrical wiring to code.


The attic bedroom, major kitchen remodel, and deck addition are pretty much exactly what we are doing. The Master Suite addition is not as this entails building a new part of the house on its own foundation with its own new roof. We are just mostly using the space we already have but with the new dormers, and earthquake retro-fitting we have to do I feel its comparable.


Now for the total average costs of doing all these jobs here in the SF Bay area......drum roll please.....


Total Average Cost = $279703


Total Average Value = $263646


Net loss = $16,057


Not pocket change for sure but the above cost number is about half what we were quoted by Winans Construction. The above is an average and I used their mid-line numbers so there may be some wiggle room in that total but still...enough to double that number? I don't think so...


As a mostly DIY'er I can look at those cost & value numbers in a different way. If I can do those same jobs for significantly less than the value they add they should all pay back even more. If by doing some of the work ourselves we can get the master suite number below $100k we'll supposedly make money on all this when we sell the house! Ya right....


It is encouraging though to know that if you do the work yourself and do it decently well you can achieve a net payback when you sell...that is, if you believe these numbers...


Using the Upscale numbers where they exist (these projects really don't match ours if you read the descriptions as they are waaaay fancier than what we are doing) you get a total of...


Upscale Total = $507876


Still less than the cost we were quoted...for work that is fancier than what we've spec'd.

Looks like we are going to be shopping the plans out to some construction firms with less overhead than what we've been dealing with.

One Step Forward 2 Steps Back.

We haven't talked much lately about our dealings with the design-build firm we hired Winans Construction. That's because there really hasn't been that much to tell. They were supposed to deliver to us the final parts of our contract the week after Thanksgiving..... They showed up on our door the week after new years.... Anyone noticing a pattern here? They set this deadline and they blew right through it without as much as a 'by your leave.'

Irene and I had a chance to look over the plans they dropped off and we found numerous issues...here's a copy of the email I sent our project manager.

Hello xxx,
We’ve had time to look thru the plan set in detail and have some issues with what we are seeing and a couple of things that we don’t understand.

Plan Set Issues we have noticed so far.

1. Engineers plan is not what we decided on still shows new footing in radiant heated areas.


2.Concerned that showing the proposed deck at the back of the house will be an issue-confuse the planning and building dept people.


3.The plan shows the proposed rear deck starting 2’ in from the side of the house; we need it to start at the edge of the house and use the 2 existing columns.


4.Concerned Engineers drawings will be too light for city to accept. I have been chastised in the past for drawings where they thought the lines were too thin-too hard to read.


5.The engineer’s wet stamp is not included in price? How can his stamp not be included in the price? We do not understand this.


6.Your note says that we have 2 copies of the planning plan set and 3 copies of the building permit plan set. What I see is 5 copies of the building permit plan set. It is our understanding that the planning set should be different from the building permit plan set. I believe that the planning set needs to show such things as all exterior views before and after, and not show interior detail, the planning set might also require photographs of the exterior views of the house and the neighboring properties?


7.It looks to me like all the plans need to be ‘cleaned up’ there are spurious dimension lines, and dimensions, on the 2nd floor demo plan, the 1st floor construction plan, 2nd floor construction plan (G), and (H) is misnamed 2nd floor construction plan when it should be 2nd floor electrical plan. I mention this as I believe that these are the kinds of things that will get it kicked out of plan check in a hurry.

I’m sure that you are eager to bring this matter to a close, as are we, but these issues will need to be addressed to our satisfaction before we sign off on the project and send you the final check.

Respectfully,

I sent this Sunday night and have not yet heard back from anyone at Winnans. I think what chaps my hide the most is they are trying to get us to pay EXTRA for the engineers wet stamp. The plans are useless without it and there is no way that it shouldn't of been included in the original price.

What I'm afraid of is, Winnans uses the design services as a loss leader and then makes their margin on the construction side. They've realized by now that they are not going to get any construction money out of us and are trying to do as little additional work as possible to close out our contract...we of course will not pay until they complete their end of the agreement to our satisfaction. We've held back $2500 out of the $8500 total which I thought would be enough to get them hopping to finish this but apparently not...live and learn next time we'll hold back more.

They were also supposed to give us electronic versions of the files and Chief Architect X1 native versions of the files which they have done.

Our plan now is to shop out the permit ready plan set to several other builders to get quotes to see if the $500k+ figure we got from Winnans is waaay off the mark. If it turns out that all the quality builders we contact come in around the same price then we will move on to phase two.

We'll then have to act as GC's and shop out the 'shelling' of the house option to quality builders-framing crews. If the cost of this option is still way insane we will move onto phase three.

Phase three is paying Winnans Construction designer to adjust our plans for a much cheaper remodel where we don't alter the roof at all or the windows in the kitchen. Then we go back to the quality contractors we've already identified and get a consensus view on what it will cost to have them do the entire thing themselves versus us acting as GC's and doing some of the work ourselves.

Then we decide what its worth to us and which route we'll take. One thing I can safely say is that we will never take the $500k+ route...unless we hit the lottery big time that is.

Wow, no pictures!

Friday, August 17, 2007

More Plans for the bottom floor.

Hello All,
Thought we would share with you the plans for the bottom floor of the house. If we can ever get the dang permits to start the job.
This first diagram is what the city calls a plot plan. It shows the footprint of your house in relation to your lot and your neighbors houses. The city of Alameda is pretty finicky about their plot plans but this one made them happy...well except for we made the lines too thin-I'm not allowed to show up there anymore with lines this thin....WE HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!!!




Here's a diagram of what was the existing first floor layout. All those transverse walls don't exist anymore. They came down when we did the gutting of that floor. We also removed the bathroom fixtures too.
That little chunked out area at the back of the house is what's causing all of our problems. That 15 by 6' area is what's triggering all of this major design review nonsense...I tell ya I'm getting super, super tired of it....

Here's what our proposed new downstairs will look like. We are going to a 9' rough ceiling everywhere down there. That way we don't have to do inset beams where we want to remove load bearing walls. With the beams below the joists we will have a lot more space to run heating and plumbing ducts and what not.
We are really looking forward to all the new shop space. With this setup we can build crazy metal art that's at least 8' by 7' and still get it out of the garage door. Its not shown in this diagram but in the bottom right corner will be where our spiral staircase we go.
Also that tiny bathroom will not be so tiny. We are going to push the wall out that the sinks on a couple of feet so it won't be so cramped. We like this setup because we have a bath and bedroom on the bottom floor for guests. And when we have outdoor parties we will have a bath on the same floor so folks don't have to trek upstairs to pee. Or when we are in the shop working we will not have to trek upstairs to pee either!!!

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

cross your fingers!

All the measuring and plans and rendering is done! at least for the moment..
This is Dan double-checking that he has all million and a half views that the planning office wants.

Off to pay scary amount of $$ and get the design review process started..

Edited to add:
It was touch and go for awhile there.. we did have to submit a few more things that we were told we wouldn't need (floor plans of the 3rd floor for a foundation permit?!), but they've been accepted! Now we get to wait a month before we find anything out.
Thanks for the good thoughts!

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Settling in, part II

The big push right now is getting plans submitted for the foundation work. The engineer's plans were finally close enough to being correct that we were able to submit them. After 4 versions of the plans he gave us North was still wrong! Dan just corrected it on the plans, which were accepted at the Building office. After 2 months to do what should have been 2 weeks' work, we really didn't want to go through another iteration!

Now we need to get a whole pile of stuff to the Planning office.. they need floorplans of all 3 levels, plus renderings of whole house now, and after the proposed work. Plus there are pictures of our house and our neighbors houses from several different perspectives. Then we get to wait about a month before we find out if it requires a major design review.

The problem is that in the back of the house, we're closing in a section under the sunroom for a stairway. Based on the foundation remnant, it used to be closed in, and the planning folk agree it probably was originally closed in.. but since it's not closed in now it's as if it never was.

So there has been much measuring, remeasuring, and fun with CAD (much less fun for Dan, who's the one doing the plans)

I've been setting things up and cleaning.. I'm pretty sure at this point I've cleaned the bathroom here more than our old house, which we lived in for more than 5 years!


You've already seen the kitchen, the other main rooms are similar.

This is the front room, with Dan stretching his back (note to anyone with a bad back: the simple stretch shown is the one thing that's provided relief from the excrutiating pain of 2 bulging discs)


For reference, this is the front room when we first saw it ->



And this is the Living Room.

Leroy had the kitchen in this room, and we were planning to use it as a temporary kitchen while we built our new kitchen in the original location at the back of the house. It was so gross though, that we kept tearing more and more out until the only thing left of the kitchen were the water and drain lines in the wall. Now, it's pretty close to what the final room will be like.


Here's the "before" shot ->

And this morning I stopped by the Title company with a copy of the Judge's Decree changing our name to Neumansky. This week we'll sign a new Deed and this really will be Chez Neumansky!

Friday, May 4, 2007

Our Master Bath Needs You!!!


Dang I must be bored out of my mind to do three blog posts in one night!!

Our master bath needs your help!! Its a weirdly shaped space and I really have no good idea on how to make use of it. The space is 17' wide and 6' deep. At the edges the knee wall is 3' 5" high and the roof is a 12/12 pitch. This is our first stab at a design and I am not happy with it. We gotta fit the clawfoot tub, a toilet, a decent sized vanity and the steam shower all up there in this weird space under the eves and I am stumped. No really, I'm stumped how we gonna fit all that stuff in there and have it be usable?


Here's the view if you were siting on the bench in the steam shower. I guess I like green tile? The toilet-vanity-tub are too close toghether and I don't know how to get more room.

Here's the view you would see if you were siting on the pot... There is 1' 7" inches between the toilet and the vanity...is that enough?
There is a whopping 1' 6" between the tub and the vanity...that can't be enough can it?


As you can see Irene and I could really use your help. Got any ideas on how to best utilize this space? We would really love to hear them. If you have the winning design or we use part of your design a fabulous prize awaits you!!!!


Seriously Hellllllp!
George from the Old House List gave me this idea for a redo. I have to admit it works a lot better. The only thing is, the bath vanity is up against a window. Where do you put the mirror? The windows are non original so I would not feel bad about losing the middle mirror so we could have a nice vanity-mirror cabinet thing there...

Look Ma No Kitchen

Please help us design our new-old-fashiony kitchen!!!

Yes well two posts in one day, see what happens when I am left alone on a Friday night?-with no Sci-Fi to watch?

<--Here is a diagram of the room that is going to be our kitchen. Right now its just an empty room with a utility sink in a corner.


<- Here's one idea of how the kitchen could look. I call this the sinks and cabinets plan. I stuck as many wall and base cabinets in as I could. You'll also notice that I removed the door to the outside at the back of the kitchen.
The stove, table and frig are the actual sizes of ours so those have to stay-be made to fit in the room. I stuck all the extra sinks around because I'm not sure where to put the sink. I would like two sinks. One big one and one small prep sink. I think the big sink should go in the corner so it will be midway between the stove and the dishwasher. I think on the counter next to the frig would be a great place for the prep sink. I also think that the base cabinets near the entryway should have 45 deg sides to match the weird angled entry.

Here's what it would look like if you were standing in the corner of the kitchen looking back. That's a lot of cabinets I think....
Here's what it could look like if you were standing in the sidedoor to the sunroom.


Here's what it would look like if you were standing in the entryway to the kitchen.




Here's what it would look like if you were standing in front of the stove looking back at the room.

Now don't think that those will be the actual style of the cabinets I'm just mostly using them as place fillers to see how the space can be filled. We really want to get cabinets that look 'old fashiony' but we are not sure what that's going to be yet. The stove and frig sure are not old fashiony and I don't know what we can do about that.

Take a look at the plans before and after and please let us know what you think. We could really use some different ideas on how to fit all the stuff a modern kitchen needs-we have to fit the table too cause I don't believe in non-eat-in kitchens.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

for good measure

We went and measured the top and bottom floors so Dan could do up a floorplan to submit to the city. Ordinarilly, you're supposed to submit final plans before you can start tearing down the walls, but they said they'd give us a permit to demo the walls if we submitted a hazardous materials report and the floorplans.


So we measured everything, and Dan magically - and by magically, I mean hours of detailed labor - turned
this
<--------


into this ---->

Tomorow we go to the permit office and hope for the best. There was asbestos found in the ugly texture in one room, so we probably can't touch that.. but hopefully we'll be able to start tearing out the rest of the rotted plaster this weekend. Dumpster #2 is being delivered Friday.